
Ok, so against my better judgement I went to see the prequel this morning. A bit of a difference from my cinemagoing experience yesterday. There were no bloody up and down teens.








I have tried to write the review for Tree Of Life for a couple of weeks now. Well actually.....no I really haven’t, I tried for a couple of days, then gave up, now I’m coming back to it.
When the film was over, the first words out of my mouth were "Oh Thank God!" just a little too loudly!
I've now read a bit more about Terrence Malick and it seems that this was autobiographical or at least semi, in which case, he is trying to make sense of his youngest brother's death. TM had an overbearing father who sent his youngest son to Spain to study gutar with Segovia, who apparently was a legendary cruel taskmaster. TM's brother broke both his own hands and his father asked TM to go over to Spain to help youngest brother and TM refused. TM's father went over and returned with his youngest brother's body. Therefore TM wasn't there when his brother needed him most.
The first hour especially and indeed the entire film was visually stunning. It was like a perfect mood board to set up the story, but the film then just stalled. Just like that.
Didn't really matter whether story was linear or non, there really wasn't much being told here only implied. Give the audience its due, we tried, REALLY HARD to stick with it, and no one walked out which I know has happened in other screenings.
I quite accept we are all part of (a) tree(s) of life, and our place on that tree draws together the interdependence through the tree down to the roots and searching for a meaning of what happens to us through memories can be incredibly painful/daunting. The meaning of life might that in God’s grand plan, nothing matters much or one ripple creates a butterfly effect. You're here, then you're not, your people mourn, reflect, reminisce, get on with it or don’t.
But really, Terence Malick is well educated who makes lovely films and should have been able to finish off The Tree Of Life without having the audience scratch its collective bemused head and be pleased the 'ordeal' was over.
A woman in my screening asked me if I understood the meaning, and I just shrugged my shoulders, shook my head and thought here is another 2 1/2 hours of my life I will never get back. And that sucks!
Or maybe I’m just completely missing the point which is quite possible. In that case, nevermind!
Absolute rubbish.
Very superficial telling of the Red Riding Hood tale with Amanda Seyfried, Julie Christie, Billy Burke, Virginia Madsen, the amzing Gary Oldman - he is a scene stealer and the Irons boy.
Catherine Hardwicke is a good director, but this is just stupid. The one thing in it's favour is that the set looks amazing.
But give it a miss.

Snape is definitely not as his most potent in this film. I'm sure that the fate of Harry Potter is weighing heavily on him. I really enjoyed Snape when he would speak through clenched teeth, drawn out tones and bringing a real sense of menace to the films. As with the books, when you understand Snape's motivation, his malevolence dissapates. His hair and skin certainly look well-cared for in this movie.
It was terrible to see what has become of Lucius Malfoy (but then that's personal, as I love Jason Isaacs and think that his force was spent at the end of the Chamber of Secrets when Dobby was made a free elf (and in my head, the Lady Gaga line - "cause I'm a free bitch baby" always appears), and Malfoy has been in decline ever since and he looks it). Hello to Jason Isaacs!
the battle between Darth Vader and Obi Wan Kenobi complete with different colour light sabre beams) - this particular battle was one of wills, which is fine, but I had seen it all before. This really should have been presented in a more original way and been longer. Maybe, there is only so much you can do with a wand fight, but I don't think that's true.
hen Voldemort is finally despatched, I thought that scene was beautifully realised. He looked like he was almost ready to go by then. Voldemort never understood the power of collective over the dominance of one. Ralph Fiennes played the role with increasing ferocity, savagery and inhumanity. What Fiennes also brought to the role was a slow dawning vulnerability as each Horcrux was destroyed. Deep in his mind I'm sure was the thought - how could this 18 year old defeat ME.
most from the The Order of the Phoenix through to now is Neville Longbottom. He was heroic in every sense of the word - he gave the Henry V speech (in your face Voldermort), he constantly stuck his hand up to say yes of course we can do this, and he was the natural leader, ever cheerful and inspiring when necessary.